Ok first i was lead to believe that a DUAL core is much slower than a Core2
the Xeon 3110 is labeled as Dual core not core 2,,,has anyone checked to see what speed they actually show under windows, someone says that a 2 gig core 2 shows as 3.5 under normal circumstances...what does the Xeon 3.0 dual core show.
are they like two 1.5 cores or really two 3.0 cores?
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on March 24, 2008 - 9:42am. Ok first i was lead to
Ok first i was lead to believe that a DUAL core is much slower than a Core2
the Xeon 3110 is labeled as Dual core not core 2,,,has anyone checked to see what speed they actually show under windows, someone says that a 2 gig core 2 shows as 3.5 under normal circumstances...what does the Xeon 3.0 dual core show.
are they like two 1.5 cores or really two 3.0 cores?